Technical Specification

Asset Classification and ESG Rating Methodology

A standardized framework for evaluating environmental, social, and governance performance within the Canadian financial landscape. This protocol ensures rigorous data verification and asset categorization for institutional-grade reporting.

Frequently Asked Questions

How are assets classified under the ESG framework?

Assets are categorized based on their adherence to the Ontario Regulation Compliance standards. We utilize a multi-tier system that evaluates primary operational impact, supply chain transparency, and carbon intensity metrics.

What data sources are utilized for ESG scoring?

Our methodology incorporates audited annual reports, third-party climate disclosures, and satellite imagery for physical asset monitoring. All data must meet the requirements outlined in our Technical Documentation for validation.

Is the rating methodology updated annually?

Yes, the weighting factors are recalibrated every 12 months to reflect shifts in Canadian federal environmental policy and international reporting standards. This ensures that the ratings remain relevant for long-term Portfolio Construction.

How is governance weighted in the overall score?

Governance metrics typically account for 30% of the aggregate score, focusing on board diversity, executive compensation structures, and rigorous anti-corruption protocols within the corporate architecture.

Methodological Advantages

Standardized protocols for institutional reliability

01

Precision Metrics

Elimination of qualitative ambiguity through the use of quantitative KPIs and verified data streams from recognized regulatory bodies.

02

Regional Relevance

Specifically tailored for the Canadian market, accounting for provincial regulations and local resource management strategies.

03

Audit Readiness

All rating outcomes are supported by a comprehensive audit trail, facilitating seamless integration into corporate sustainability reports.

1. Rating Scales Instruction

The Thatch and Table ESG Rating Scale operates on a 0.0 to 10.0 numerical index. This index is subdivided into five primary performance quintiles. Users must first identify the asset class before applying the weighting coefficient. For instance, infrastructure projects in Hamilton require a different baseline than service-sector equity.

Quintile Score Range Classification
Tier I 8.1 – 10.0 Exemplary Compliance
Tier II 6.1 – 8.0 Advanced Integration
Tier III 4.1 – 6.0 Standard Alignment

To calculate the final score, multiply the raw environmental metric by 0.4, the social metric by 0.3, and the governance metric by 0.3. The sum provides the aggregate ESG score used for risk assessment.

2. Environmental Impact Metrics

Environmental assessment focuses on absolute and intensity-based carbon emissions (Scope 1, 2, and 3). We mandate the use of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol for all reporting. Special consideration is given to water scarcity risks and biodiversity impact, particularly for Hamilton Renewable Energy Infrastructure Projects.

  • Energy efficiency ratios (kWh per unit of production).
  • vector-2 Waste diversion rates and hazardous material management protocols.
  • Supply chain environmental audits (ISO 14001 certification status).

3. Social & Governance Indicators

Social indicators measure the human capital management and community relations. Key data points include the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and employee turnover statistics. Governance evaluation requires a detailed review of the proxy statement and bylaws to ensure shareholder rights are protected and risks are mitigated.

"Governance is the structural foundation upon which environmental and social initiatives are built. Without robust oversight, ESG reporting lacks the necessary accountability for institutional trust."

We also examine executive compensation alignment with sustainability targets. For more on how these factors influence tax structures, see our guide on Canadian Tax Implications.

4. Data Verification Standards

Data integrity is paramount. All submitted metrics must undergo a three-stage verification process: internal audit, algorithmic anomaly detection, and third-party attestation (Limited or Reasonable Assurance). This protocol minimizes the risk of greenwashing and ensures data parity across different sectors.

Verification Checklist:
  1. Cross-reference reported emissions with utility billing cycles.
  2. Validate social metrics against HRIS (Human Resource Information System) data.
  3. Verify board meeting minutes for governance oversight implementation.
  4. Authenticate third-party certificates through issuing bodies.

Implement the ESG Framework Today

Access our full suite of technical resources and rating tools to align your portfolio with current Canadian regulatory standards.

Compliance Status

All methodologies are reviewed according to CSA Staff Notice 81-334 and relevant IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards.

Certification

ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems Certified. Audit Reference: 2023-CAN-ESG-0982.

Data Latency

Market data feeds operate on a T+1 settlement cycle for all ESG rating adjustments and classification updates.

Corporate Entity
Thatch and Table Asset Management Ltd.
100 King St W, Toronto, ON M5X 1A9
Business No: 82736 4910 RT0001